I actually just signed up to ask this.

There is a kind sword of damokles hanging over many comic artist and this is a fun question to ask (imho) so, how'd you, as a comic artist feel if your comic would be rule 34'ed ?

(info: http://instant-thinking.de/2006/09/29/rule-34/ )

Feel free to ban me if i'm being too annoying here. I just want to point out that the question it may not be entirely pg-13 in nature, but a discussion does not have to be nc-17, too ... ^^

-yamyam, best discribed as a pest




edited to fix link  

--Last edited by John on 2008-03-07 07:41:57 --

Well, considering that most every "relationship" (aside from Scott and Ashley) is brother-sister, I think it'd be pretty disturbing.  Then again, it'd be no more disturbing than something involving Calvin and Hobbes (I wouldn't even want to know about that).

Fan fiction is just fine by me.  However, that kind of fan fiction isn't really my cup of tea.

Good to see a rational and calm answer here.

You're right, it is disturbing, but the internet is a disturbing place, isn't it ?

Thanks for answering.

Bye

John, you get all types on this forum.

Indeed he does

Hey, i'm just curious. ^^

John, with Sandusky's cast it could be worse than that...     ...but I think I'd better close my yap.

Quote :

John, with Sandusky's cast it could be worse than that...      ...but I think I'd better close my yap.

Indeed.  

Okay, I acutally fell out of my chair I was laughing so hard... and then I thought of Sandusky in that context, and I almost shot myself.

I'm never gonna clear my head of that mental image. Dang you, Internet, mentally disturbing me since 1996!

Whenever this topic comes up (and it does frequently!), I'm reminded of Amber Paniko's poster that she did back in 2004; I guess it still holds true.



- Mitzi